Pular para o conteúdo principal
Produção Acadêmica

MORTALITY INEQUALITIES MEASURED BY SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATORS IN BRAZIL: A SCOPING REVIEW

Tipo: Produção Bibliográfica
| Ano: 2022

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: Summarize the literature on the relationship between composite socioeconomic indicators and mortality in different geographical areas of Brazil.METHODS:  This  scoping  review  included  articles  published  between  January  1,  2000,  and  August 31, 2020, retrieved by means of a bibliographic search carried out in the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs databases. Studies reporting on the association between composite socioeconomic indicators and all-cause, or specific cause of death in any age group in different geographical  areas  were  selected.  The  review  summarized  the  measures  constructed,  their  associations with the outcomes, and potential study limitations.RESULTS: Of the 77 full texts that met the inclusion criteria, the study reviewed 24. The area level of composite socioeconomic indicators analyzed comprised municipalities (n = 6), districts (n = 5), census tracts (n = 4), state (n = 2), country (n = 2), and other areas (n = 5). Six studies used composite socioeconomic indicators such as the Human Development Index, Gross Domestic Product, and the  Gini  Index;  the  remaining  18  papers  created  their  own  socioeconomic  measures  based  on  sociodemographic  and  health  indicators.  Socioeconomic  status  was  inversely  associated  with  higher  rates  of  all-cause  mortality,  external  cause  mortality,  suicide,  homicide,  fetal  and  infant  mortality, respiratory and circulatory diseases, stroke, infectious and parasitic diseases, malnutrition, gastroenteritis, and oropharyngeal cancer. Higher mortality rates due to colorectal cancer, leukemia, a general group of neoplasms, traffic accident, and suicide, in turn, were observed in less deprived areas and/or those with more significant socioeconomic development. Underreporting of death and differences in mortality coverage in Brazilian areas were cited as the main limitation.CONCLUSIONS: Studies analyzed mortality inequalities in different geographical areas by means of composite socioeconomic indicators, showing that the association directions vary according to the mortality outcome. But studies on all-cause mortality and at the census tract level remain scarce. The results may guide the development of new composite socioeconomic indicators for use in mortality inequality analysis. DESCRIPTORS: Mortality, trends. Geographic Locations, epidemiology. Socioeconomic Factors. Health Status Disparities. Review

Membros

Everton Emanuel Campos de Lima
MARIA YURY TRAVASSOS ICHIHARA
ANDREA JACQUELINE FORTES FERREIRA
CAMILA SILVEIRA SILVA TEIXEIRA
FLAVIA JOSE OLIVEIRA ALVES
ALINE DOS SANTOS ROCHA
VICTOR HUGO DIAS DIOGENES
ELZO PEREIRA PINTO JUNIOR
RENZO JOEL FLORES ORTIZ
LILIA CAROLINA CARNEIRO DA COSTA
MARCOS ROBERTO GONZAGA
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO NORTE